Follow us on LinkedIn at USVisasInsider and Twitter
Employment Workplace Relations
Director, Philip Brewin is a specialist in Workplace Relations and heads our Workplace Relations Work Group.
Corporate and Business Law
The Nevett Ford Corporate and Business Law team has a wealth of experience and expertise and have established quality relationships with clients, including many small and medium business enterprises, across a wide range of industries.
Dispute Resolution ( Litigation)
Nevett Ford has wide experience in all manner of litigation.
Mediation
Mediation is a process and set of principles designed to manage and resolve disputes between parties. It is an efficient and effective method of dispute resolution that can help to preserve relationships through the intervention of a third party, known as a mediator.
Property Law
Nevett Ford has been conveying Victorian property for more than 150 years.
Tuesday, 16 December 2014
Want to go to the U.S.? Visit our USA Visas Experts site
Follow us on LinkedIn at USVisasInsider and Twitter
Thursday, 20 November 2014
President Obama announces Executive Action on Immigration
H-1B petition applications expected to increase yet again in 2015!
U.S. Attorneys are saying that H-1B petition applications are just going to keep increasing exponentially in the coming years, however supply will remain low. "About 87,000 applicants didn't hear their number called in last year's lottery; many of them will likely try again in 2015, whether with the same prospective employer or a new one."
In the past, the window for filing H-1B petitions from April 1 has be open for weeks and sometimes even months, however next year this window of opportunity is set to be limited to merely days due to the large volume of applications being submitted.
Please see the following link for the full article: http://www.informationweek.com/strategic-cio/team-building-and-staffing/h-1b-visas-what-to-expect-in-2015/a/d-id/1317529
Sunday, 16 November 2014
An Executive Order On U.S. Immigration Would Not Be Unprecedented
National Visa Center No Longer Collecting Original Civil Documents
New U.S. - China Visa Reciprocal Agreement
Thursday, 6 November 2014
Tighter screening processes imposed on people travelling to the United States on the Visa Waiver Program (ESTA).
Wednesday, 22 October 2014
What is the difference between U.S. Visa Validity and the I-94 Entry Validity?
- A U.S. visa gives foreign citizens (non-U.S. citizens) permission to travel and enter the United States at a port of entry. Once at the port of entry, the Customs Border and Protection (CBP) officer will determine whether the foreign citizen can enter the United States.
- As part of the admission process, the CBP officer will determine whether the visa holder can enter the United States at the port of entry and the duration of stay for any particular visit. During this process the U.S. visa holder will be issued an I-94 validity either by way of a stamp in the visa holder’s passport or electronically outlining the admission date, the class of admission, and the date that the traveler is admitted until. Foreign citizens travelling to the United States must adhere to the I-94 validity and ensure that they depart the United States prior to the expiry date in order to prevent becoming unlawful and/or visa cancellation.
The dates of the visa expiration and the I-94 expiration may differ. The I-94 expiry date is most important and there may be instances where the I-94 expiration date is AFTER the visa expiration date. In that case, you may legally remain in the U.S. however, any underlying work authorization attached to a visa validity date may expire when the visa does. If in doubt about your ability to remain in the U.S., please consult an Immigration Attorney.
Monday, 20 October 2014
Abbott announces reforms to the 457 visa program
Ryan Curtis-Griffiths, Director at Nevett Ford, provided insight into the reforms for HC Magazine online.
The full article can be found at HC Online
Obligation to provide training : 457 business sponsors
The training benchmarks for an established business are:
(A) Recent expenditure, by the business, to the equivalent of at least 2% of the payroll of the business, in payments allocated to an industry training fund that operates in the same industry as the business
or
(B) Recent expenditure, by the business, to the equivalent of at least 1% of the payroll of the business, in the provision of training to employees of the business.
This obligation is assessable on an annual basis, in the twelve month period commencing on the day on which the sponsor is approved, provided the sponsor has engaged a Subclass 457 visa holder at any stage during that twelve month period.
The obligation ends:
- if the period of approval is less than six years, the obligation ends three years after the person is approved as a standard business sponsor
- if the period of approval is at least six years, the obligation ends six years after the person is approved as a standard business sponsor.
Wednesday, 15 October 2014
Industry Innovation and Competitiveness Agenda (457 visa program & expanding the investment visa program)
- streamline the processing
of sponsorship, nomination and visa applications around risk-factors
to reward low-risk applicants and re-focus compliance and
monitoring activities on high-risk applicants;
- reform sponsorship
requirements to reduce the time and cost to businesses; increase the
sponsorship approval period from 12 to 18 months for start-up
businesses, to give start-ups more time to build their businesses to
ensure sustainability;
- provide greater
flexibility in relation to English language testing and skill requirements for
457 applicants, to ensure that the standards required are appropriate for
the industries and occupations being sought; and
- retain the Temporary Skilled Migration Income Threshold at $53,900, ahead of a future review of its operation.
- streamline and
enhance visa processing, further promote the programme globally and
strengthen integrity measures, to increase the attractiveness of investing
and settling in Australia while ensuring Australia’s interests are
protected;
- align the criteria
for eligible (or ‘complying’) investments with the
Government’s national investment priorities. The investment eligibility
criteria will be determined by Austrade in consultation with key
economic and industry portfolios;
- introduce a Premium
Investor visa (PIV), offering a more expeditious, 12 month pathway
to permanent residency than the SIV, for those meeting a $15 million threshold;
and
- task Austrade to
become a nominating entity for SIV (complementing the current State
and Territory governments’ role as nominators) and to be the sole
nominating entity for PIV.
Monday, 13 October 2014
Significant Investor Visa (SIV) changes & creation of Premium Investor Visa (PIV) ($15 million) category
- the involvement of Austrade in the nomination of applicants on behalf of the Australian Government and in determining complying investment policy
- allowing 'role swapping' between primary and secondary applicants during the provisional visa stage
- introduction of 180 day residency requirements for secondary visa holders
- changes to improve visa processing times
Have you entered the Diversity Visa Lottery? Beware of fraudulent emails and letters!
Please refer to the following link for further information: http://travel.state.gov/content/visas/english/general/fraud.html
Sunday, 12 October 2014
What is expatriate adoption?
Note: Depending on the law and adoption process of the countries involved, such adoptions may or may not be able to meet Australian migration law or family law requirements.
Australian Commonwealth, state and territory adoption authorities are not responsible for expatriate adoptions, and do not assess or approve applications for such adoptions.
Children adopted by Australian citizens or permanent residents via expatriate adoption arrangements are not automatically entitled to visas for entry to Australia. Any expatriate adoption must meet Australian immigration requirements in addition to being a lawful adoption in the overseas country. The most appropriate visa is the subclass 102 Adoption Visa.
What is the difference between the SOL and the CSOL?
The current Skilled Occupation List (SOL) is relevant for applicants for:
- independent points-based skilled migration who are not nominated by a state or territory government agency (such as the subclass 189 visa);
- Temporary Graduate visa (subclass 485) - Graduate Work stream.
Whereas whe current Consolidated Sponsored Occupation List (CSOL) is relevant for applicants for:
- points-based skilled migration who are nominated by a state or territory government agency under a State Migration Plan
- the Employer Nomination Scheme (ENS), who must have been nominated by an Australian employer to fill a position in an occupation that appears in the CSOL (such as the subclass 186 and 187 visa)
- the Temporary Work (Skilled) visa (subclass 457)
- the Training and Research visa (subclass 402).
Wednesday, 8 October 2014
Migration Lawyers
We have a qualified and experienced team of migration lawyers to assist with Australian migration law issues. These services include:
- General and Complex Migration Law issues
- Visa Cancellations
- Visa Application Refusals
- Expired visas and unlawful Residence Status
- Employer Sanctions and Investigations
- Appeals to the Migration review Tribunal
- Appeals to the Federal Court and High Court
- Appeals to the Minister for immigration and border protection.
Martin Bowles, Immigration Secretary, to Head Health Deparment
Mr. Bowles used to be a senior public servant in New South Wales. He assumed his reins at the Immigration department back in 2012. Mr. Abbott, the prime minister of Australia said he is going to officially take up his new position on the 13th of October, 2014.
Meanwhile, Mr. Chris Moraitis, who is the deputy secretary of the Department of Foreign Affairs besides being an experienced diplomat and the former high commissioner to Papua New Guinea, has also just been revealed to be promoted as the head of the Attorney-General’s Department.
Mr. Abbott has just announced the new appointments this afternoon, in a statement that also says the replacement of Mr. Bowles at the Department of Immigration and Border Protection is going to be announced in the near future.
The Australian government still has not yet announced who is going to replace Mr. Martin Parkinson, the Treasury secretary, who is going to be relieved from his position following the G20 leaders’ summit to be held in Brisbane this November. Mr. Abbott has shown his strong feelings about ”stamping” his authority on the Treasury, and the recent biography of Mr. Hockey written by journalist Madonna King has revealed that the Treasurer of Australia was not consulted about the matter before the sacking of Mr. Parkinson.
”I congratulate Mr. Bowles & Mr. Moraitis & look forward to working with them in their new roles,” Mr Abbott said.
Mr. Bowles joined the Department of Immigration back in 2011 after he served in the Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency as the deputy secretary. He also served in the Department of Defence, also as a deputy secretary back in 2006.
Mr. Moraitis on the other hand, joined the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade back in 1989, and became its deputy secretary in April of 2013.
“I will announce arrangements for the position of the Secretary of the Department of Immigration and Border Protection in the near future,” the Prime Minister said.
Source: TheAustralian.com.au by Jared Owens
Visa Requirements to be Eased for Skilled Foreign Workers
It is in the opinion of the Greens, Labor, and the unions that what the Abbott government is actually doing is making life much harder for Australian job seekers, especially when it shows the country’s unemployment rates have risen. However, the plan was welcomed by major business groups, saying that the proposal was ”balanced.”
Mr. Scott Morrison, the minister for the Department of Immigration and Border Protection, has shown his support for some of the outlined recommendations enumerated in a 457 visa program report commissioned by the government.
The minister played down the likelihood of moving quickly to get rid of the labour market testing, and that he suggested there are other, far less controversial suggestions which were going to get the support of the Senate.
Labour market testing was legislated by the former government of then Prime Minister Julia Gillard, and it requires the potential employers of individuals under the 457 visa program to show that they tried looking for a candidate from the local labour market to make sure that Australians had the opportunity first and foremost to get the job, before it is made available to foreign workers.
There was a report published on Wednesday that said the labour market testing which was conducted by employers should be abolished as it did not guarantee reliability and had actually been proven ineffective a number of times in the Australian context.
Mr. Morrison said that the labour market testing regime that was started by the former Gillard government was laborious and was one of the reasons why the program was suffocating with regulation at the unions’ urging. He continued on by saying that he sees himself as a ”realist” and that there were a lot of other recommendations which he could undertake in a far less controversial manner.
The review had twenty two recommendations all in all, and it also included there be changes done to the English language requirements for the applicants of the 457 visa program.
It was suggested in the report that the requirement be shifted to an average of at least 5, instead of necessitating visa applicants to get a score of 5 in all of the four tests which comprise of the following: Listening, speaking, reading, and writing.
The report was also calling for greater flexibility to the businesses or industries that are asking for concessions to the English language requirement on a case to case basis. The Immigration minister is all for changes to be made in this area.”The English language requirements are unnecessarily restrictive, serving more as an industrial lock-out rather than an honest attempt to ensure appropriate language skills which the government does believe is important,” said Mr. Morrison on a speech to the National Press Club in Canberra. ”There are more practical ways to achieve what is needed here and moving to an averaging system would remove much unnecessary cost and complexity.”
He was also in support of a recommendation to make adjustments on salary rate rules in the market.
These rules will be placed to make sure 457 visa holders receive the same pay and the same conditions of employment as Australians who are doing the same kind of work. However, employers are exempted from showing market rates for job positions that have a salary of two hundred fifty thousand dollars per year.
In the report, it said that the market rate should still be one of the core components of the 457 visa program however, the threshold of earnings for the exemption needs to be reduced to the same level that was applied prior to the year 2013.
”I support the continuation of the market rate framework, but will, in line with the recommendations of the review, look favourably on introducing a deregulation measure that brings the income bar for exemption from market rate assessment in line with the top marginal tax rate of one hundred eighty thousand dollars,” Mr. Morrison said. ”I am also attracted to the proposals that support trusted legitimate sponsors & help them manage their compliance & reporting obligations more effectively, whilst making it more difficult for those with dishonest intent to make fraudulent application.”
The minister also went on to say that he agrees with the fact that the process of sponsorship renewal needs to be made more simple. He also thinks that reporting time frames need to be extended, and the legislation be brought forward to make it illegal for visa applicants to pay sponsors for a migration outcome. He believes that it needs to be reinforced by a heavy penalty and a framework of conviction.
According Mr. Bill Shorten, the leader of Opposition, unemployment is now at a twelve-year high in the country, which is similar to the unemployment rate in the United States.
”I think the government needs to carefully consider whether or not it wants to make it easier to bring in 457 visa holders at a time when Australians can’t find jobs,” stated Mr. Shorten.
According to Mr. Marles, the Immigration spokesman to Labor, the plans to lower down the English language requirements is ”extremely alarming” and could potentially harm safety in the workplace as overseas workers will be left ”at risk of being exploited by dodgy employers.”
Mr. Adam Bandt, the deputy leader of the Greens, stated that his party is going to ”strongly fight any move to remove the need to advertise locally.”
”If employers do not even have to look for workers locally first, the 457 visa program will turn back into a pool of cheap labour from overseas,” Mr. Bandt said. ”Benefitting some employers at the expense of workers and the long-term skills base of the country.”
Ms. Ged Kearney, the president of the Australian Council of Trade Unions, said it would be completely ”ludicrous” if the labour market testing was abolished.
”Unemployment is at a twelve-year high,” she said. ”Yet, instead of creating a plan for jobs & investing in skills & training, the answer from the government & big businesses is to make it easier for employers to bring in foreign workers.”
Australian Mines and Metal Association (or AMMA), a resource industry employer group, has expressed their support in ”more practical & effective” standards when it comes to English language testing and lowering the comparison in the market salary rate.
”Clearly employers should not be burdened with onerous salary comparison requirements for high-income earners being paid more than one hundred eighty thousand dollars per year,” said Mr. Steve Knott, the chief executive of AMMA.
However, it is being argued by the Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry that the labour market testing was ”red tape” as there were a lot of employers who are already aware of their local labour market’s strengths and weaknesses even before all of these issues have been thrown into the spotlight.
The report was conducted by a panel of 4 members, and was also led by Mr. John Azarias, a former public servant.
The review was commissioned by Sen. Michaelia Cash, the assistant minister of the Department of Immigration and Border Protection (DIBP). She said that the panel led by Mr. Azarias had consulted with one hundred fifty organisations from different stakeholder groups that comprised of unions, employers, and individuals concerned.
“Notably the independent panel found no evidence to back the claims made by the previous Labor government of widespread rorting of the program,” Senator Cash stated when asked about the issue on Wednesday. “The government will announce a detailed response to the report shortly.”
Thursday, 2 October 2014
Government investigating 457 visa fraud
Wednesday, 24 September 2014
Disallowance motion - successful (Parent visas & other family visas can now be lodged again)
We can assist with Contributory Parent and Non-contributory Parent visa and other family visa applications.
Monday, 22 September 2014
Significant Investor Visa (SIV) - Update
Item
|
Total
|
Expressions of Interest (EOI) submitted through SkillSelect
|
1650
|
Invitations to apply for a SIV issued as a result of applicants being
nominated by a state or territory government
|
1382
|
Primary applications lodged
|
1172
|
Primary visas granted
|
386
|
State
|
EOIs
submitted
|
Invitations
|
Applications
lodged
|
Visas
granted
|
Any
|
39
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
ACT
|
4
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
NSW
|
550
|
431
|
380
|
146
|
NT
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Qld
|
105
|
82
|
64
|
22
|
SA
|
41
|
35
|
24
|
9
|
Tas.
|
3
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Vic.
|
846
|
783
|
663
|
193
|
WA
|
61
|
50
|
40
|
16
|
Total
|
1650
|
1382
|
1172
|
386
|
Applicants
for top five source countries
|
Percentage
of total visa applications
|
Grants for
top five source countries
|
Percentage
of total visas granted
|
China
|
90.9
|
China
|
87.6
|
Hong Kong
|
3.1
|
Hong Kong
|
3.1
|
Malaysia
|
1.0
|
South Africa
|
1.6
|
South Africa
|
0.6
|
Japan
|
1.3
|
Taiwan
|
0.6
|
Malaysia
|
1.3
|
State
|
EOIs
submitted
|
Invitations
|
Applications
lodged
|
Visas granted
|
ANY
|
13
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
ACT
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
NSW
|
287
|
209
|
198
|
101
|
NT
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Qld
|
54
|
36
|
33
|
19
|
SA
|
25
|
28
|
20
|
8
|
Tas.
|
1
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
Vic.
|
582
|
517
|
452
|
140
|
WA
|
29
|
24
|
18
|
14
|
Total
|
992
|
815
|
722
|
282
|