Generally speaking, in order for a partner visa application
to be valid, the making of the application must comply with schedule 3
criterion 3001 of the migration regulations, which provide that the application
must be made within 28 days of last holding a substantive Visa.
If the relevant schedule 3 criteria has not been met, it is
necessary for a decision maker to determine if compelling reasons exist for not
applying it. Compelling reasons relate to the hardship that can result if an
unlawful noncitizen wishing to remain in Australia on spouse grounds is obliged
to leave Australia and apply from overseas.
Under policy, compelling reasons include the existence of an
Australian citizen child or a long-standing partner relationship (taken to be
at least 2 years) between an applicant and sponsor, at time of application.
The term ‘compelling’ is not defined in the legislation,
however in a full Federal Court case it was said that in any view of the
meaning of compelling ‘the circumstances must be so powerful that they leave
the decision maker to make a positive finding that the regulation should be waived’.
Policy states that the existence of a genuine relationship between an applicant
and their sponsor is not sufficient to establish compelling reasons to waive
schedule 3; however it is not prescriptive as to what circumstances do
constitute compelling factors.
Another hurdle which applicants must overcome is that in
addition to being able to demonstrate that there are compelling circumstances,
it is also necessary to show that the failure to lodge a partner visa
application whilst not holding a substantive visa was due to circumstances
beyond the applicant’s control.
In summary therefore, whilst it is possible for persons who
do not hold a current substantive Visa and who are in a partner relationship to
lodge a partner visa application, it is necessary to be mindful of what is
required to be shown in order to avoid a rejection.
No comments:
Post a Comment